AIA
All projects

Case study · Operational systems

From meeting to next steps with 10 minutes of review

After a meeting, the system uses the recording to prepare a brief summary, a task list, a CRM draft and an email draft. A person reviews everything before use.

This case study describes an implemented system for processing meetings and preparing next steps.

≈ 2 hours → ≈ 10 min of reviewManual post-meeting preparation
4 clear outputsWhat it prepares

01 / Problem

After a meeting, all important agreements had to be found and recorded again.

After the conversation, the notes or recording had to be reviewed, a summary written, tasks assigned and an email prepared. This often took considerable time.

If the review came too late, an important agreement could be forgotten or it might be unclear who needed to take the next step.

How the work was done before5 steps
  1. 01

    Reopen the notes or recording

  2. 02

    Write the summary manually

  3. 03

    Identify tasks and accountable people

  4. 04

    Update the client data

  5. 05

    Write an email with the next steps

02 / What we wanted to achieve

We wanted agreements and tasks to be prepared quickly, while ensuring that nothing is sent to the client or entered into the CRM without human review.

03 / Solution

One recording becomes a clear summary and list of next steps.

The system prepares several separate drafts. This makes it immediately clear what is information, what is a task and what needs to go into an email.

How the solution works5 steps
  1. 01

    Converts speech to text

    Converts the recording into a searchable transcript.

  2. 02

    Identifies agreements

    Separates key decisions, open questions and committed tasks.

  3. 03

    Prepares drafts

    Writes a summary, task list, CRM draft and email draft.

  4. 04

    A person reviews

    Matej checks that the facts, responsibilities and tone are correct.

  5. 05

    Saves or sends

    Only drafts approved by a person are used.

Where a person reviews the work

  • the source meeting transcript can always be reviewed
  • facts, agreements and open questions are kept separate
  • the correct client and contact are verified before entry
  • the email remains a draft until a person approves it

04 / Result

Next steps are prepared faster, while the email is not sent without review.

Work that previously took approximately two hours now requires approximately ten minutes of review for a typical meeting. The system organizes the information, while a person confirms what is accurate.

Summaries and tasks follow a consistent format, making them easier to find and understand later.

Manual post-meeting preparation≈ 2 hours → ≈ 10 min of review

The system prepares drafts, and Matej reviews the facts and next steps before use.

What it prepares4 clear outputs

It can prepare a summary, tasks, a CRM draft and an email draft from the same recording.

What changed for the team

  • next steps are produced faster after the meeting
  • less need to replay entire recordings
  • responsibilities and open questions are separated more clearly
  • the email remains personal because a person reviews it

05 / Important considerations

What needs to be considered.

  • If the recording is poor or the agreement is unclear, the draft will also be incomplete.
  • The system does not send important messages without human review.
  • Before entering data into the CRM, the correct person and any existing record must be verified.

Case study: The time is a comparison between manual preparation and review of automatically prepared materials.

View other systems

Next step

What happens in your process five minutes after a meeting?

Let's review which information needs to become a task, record or message — and who must approve the result.